according to MSNBC Analyst
Published on July 2, 2005 By zinkadoodle In Politics
If this is true, then Rove is looking at a bunch of heavy duty federal indictments that not even his chow boy, bush, will be able to bail him out of. Purjury will be the least of his problems. I believe Acts of Treason will be the bigger hammer. If this is true, then finally it will be put to rest that the White House itself was the leak. And, the contention that it was to discredit Plame's husband for stating that the Niger documents were false will finally, finally see the light of day in mainstream media. And, maybe, maybe it will be the beginning of the end of the dubya dynasty. This country is long overdue for a regime change.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MSNBC Analyst Says Cooper Documents Reveal Karl Rove as Source in Plame Case

By E&P Staff

Published: July 01, 2005 11:30 PM ET

NEW YORK Now that Time Inc. has turned over documents to federal court, presumably revealing who its reporter, Matt Cooper, identified as his source in the Valerie Plame/CIA case, speculation runs rampant on the name of that source, and what might happen to him or her. Tonight, on the syndicated McLaughlin Group political talk show, Lawrence O'Donnell, senior MSNBC political analyst, claimed to know that name--and it is, according to him, top White House mastermind Karl Rove.

Here is the transcript of O'Donnell's remarks:

"What we're going to go to now in the next stage, when Matt Cooper's e-mails, within Time Magazine, are handed over to the grand jury, the ultimate revelation, probably within the week of who his source is.

"And I know I'm going to get pulled into the grand jury for saying this but the source of...for Matt Cooper was Karl Rove, and that will be revealed in this document dump that Time magazine's going to do with the grand jury."

Other panelists then joined in discussing whether, if true, this would suggest a perjury rap for Rove, if he told the grand jury he did not leak to Cooper.

Comments (Page 5)
5 PagesFirst 3 4 5 
on Jul 07, 2005
The White House was not happy that Wilson debunked the Bush story about nuclear weapons in Iraq. The simple fact is that this is a serious crime and the person who broke the law needs to be punished!


Wilson did not debunk anything. I have showed stories that state the exact opposite.
on Jul 07, 2005
IF people would take the time to read the Niger commission's report, which I did a year ago, they'd find that Mr. Wilson himself was debunked. There were a lot of things he was "fuzzy" about, that maybe he hadn't remembered correctly at the time, etc., etc.

People don't listen to vindication, though, only blame and smear. Not even the Kerry campaign would stomach hosting his site after the commissions findings came out.

This is a non-issue. She was glorified office staff, and the two of them started joking about book deals the moment her name got in the paper. No one really even knows whether Novak has already talked to the prosecutor or not.

I'd REALLY like to know why anyone would think these people would go to jail for Rove. Or, why in the hell Rove would PERSONALLY wave his agreement for anonymity, as the souce already has.
on Jul 07, 2005
I asked in my blog then if we could expect the Left to apologize since they had found Wilson to have been "creative" with his Niger information. Did they? Nope, they're right back here, trying to complete Wilson's job to smear Rove.

Ah, those self-fulfilling prophecies.
on Jul 07, 2005
Did they? Nope, they're right back here, trying to complete Wilson's job to smear Rove.


Once again, to the left, it is the evidence (or lack there of) that counts, but the seriousness of the charges.
5 PagesFirst 3 4 5